<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Editors and Contracts: Editor Beware!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://americaneditor.wordpress.com/2011/12/05/editors-and-contracts-editor-beware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://americaneditor.wordpress.com/2011/12/05/editors-and-contracts-editor-beware/</link>
	<description>Commentary on Books, eBooks, and Editorial Matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:50:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Business of Editing: Liability Insurance &#8212; Nyet &#124; An American Editor</title>
		<link>http://americaneditor.wordpress.com/2011/12/05/editors-and-contracts-editor-beware/#comment-8907</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Business of Editing: Liability Insurance &#8212; Nyet &#124; An American Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americaneditor.wordpress.com/?p=2250#comment-8907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] of the promised fee (see, e.g., The Business of Editing: Contracts — A Slippery Slope and Editors and Contracts: Editor Beware!). Recent discussions on various for a have focused on another requirement: the requirement to [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of the promised fee (see, e.g., The Business of Editing: Contracts — A Slippery Slope and Editors and Contracts: Editor Beware!). Recent discussions on various for a have focused on another requirement: the requirement to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Business of Editing: Contracts &#8212; A Slippery Slope &#171; An American Editor</title>
		<link>http://americaneditor.wordpress.com/2011/12/05/editors-and-contracts-editor-beware/#comment-3809</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Business of Editing: Contracts &#8212; A Slippery Slope &#171; An American Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 08:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americaneditor.wordpress.com/?p=2250#comment-3809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] am being asked to sign a contract. This has occurred since the last time I addressed this issue, in Editors and Contracts: Editor Beware! In the prior article, I talked about a contract from India. Today, I am talking about a contract [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] am being asked to sign a contract. This has occurred since the last time I addressed this issue, in Editors and Contracts: Editor Beware! In the prior article, I talked about a contract from India. Today, I am talking about a contract [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: editor911</title>
		<link>http://americaneditor.wordpress.com/2011/12/05/editors-and-contracts-editor-beware/#comment-2999</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor911]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 09:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americaneditor.wordpress.com/?p=2250#comment-2999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent post that captures the dilemmas currently facing many editors!

I especially like this comment: Professional editors really need a professional guild, at least a national one but preferably a worldwide one, whose focus is on protecting the member editors and finding the member editors work.

Amen! Let&#039;s start that professional guild for editors right here. What do we need to get it going? The National Writers Union is a one example of an organized network for scribes. Does this blog author have any suggestions? I&#039;ll be the first one to sign up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post that captures the dilemmas currently facing many editors!</p>
<p>I especially like this comment: Professional editors really need a professional guild, at least a national one but preferably a worldwide one, whose focus is on protecting the member editors and finding the member editors work.</p>
<p>Amen! Let&#8217;s start that professional guild for editors right here. What do we need to get it going? The National Writers Union is a one example of an organized network for scribes. Does this blog author have any suggestions? I&#8217;ll be the first one to sign up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Book Doctor</title>
		<link>http://americaneditor.wordpress.com/2011/12/05/editors-and-contracts-editor-beware/#comment-2997</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Book Doctor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americaneditor.wordpress.com/?p=2250#comment-2997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hear, hear! In my 40-year editorial career, I have signed no more than a handful of contracts, all designed to establish that I am an independent contractor, not an employee. I would absolutely reject any contract like the one Dick describes. In fact, I would write a substitute contract entirely in my favor, send it to the Indian vendor, and tell whoever sent it that I&#039;d see him in small claims court in my city if the company failed to pay immediately for the work already done. Then I&#039;d sit back and wait for my check before continuing work. I&#039;d keep the publisher (end buyer) fully informed.

Nobody can be so desperate for a job that she should sign such an abomination, especially after already starting work. No court will enforce a contract that both parties haven&#039;t agreed to. Fortunately, it sounds like Dick has a good intermediary in the publisher.

Perhaps freelancers should preempt in such situations by having a standard contract to send to the vendor first? I&#039;ve never felt obliged to do so (I work directly with authors most of the time, with a simple letter of agreement or email spelling out obligations), but it might be a good idea.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hear, hear! In my 40-year editorial career, I have signed no more than a handful of contracts, all designed to establish that I am an independent contractor, not an employee. I would absolutely reject any contract like the one Dick describes. In fact, I would write a substitute contract entirely in my favor, send it to the Indian vendor, and tell whoever sent it that I&#8217;d see him in small claims court in my city if the company failed to pay immediately for the work already done. Then I&#8217;d sit back and wait for my check before continuing work. I&#8217;d keep the publisher (end buyer) fully informed.</p>
<p>Nobody can be so desperate for a job that she should sign such an abomination, especially after already starting work. No court will enforce a contract that both parties haven&#8217;t agreed to. Fortunately, it sounds like Dick has a good intermediary in the publisher.</p>
<p>Perhaps freelancers should preempt in such situations by having a standard contract to send to the vendor first? I&#8217;ve never felt obliged to do so (I work directly with authors most of the time, with a simple letter of agreement or email spelling out obligations), but it might be a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
