An American Editor

November 1, 2010

How Much Is That Job Worth?

I read the other day that Meg Whitman has spent $143 million of her own money in her quest to become governor of California. Today I read that midterm campaign spending will set a new record — nearly $4 billion, approximately 50% more than the last midterm election spending, and the article didn’t make it clear whether this was spending on just federal races or on all races (my bet is just federal races). These numbers started me thinking, primarily about how far down the wrong path we seem to be going.

How much is the job of governor of California really worth? Or United States senator or representative? To the office seekers, apparently a lot, but I don’t understand the return, unless it is sheer naked power or being able to say “I am 1 of 50!” Does Meg Whitman really need to be governor to influence policy? As the various pressure groups demonstrate daily, one can buy a lot of lobby power and influence for a lot less than $143 million.

But consider the other ramifications. A lot of Americans go to bed hungry, and with no health insurance. If it costs $12,000 a year to buy a family health insurance plan in the private marketplace, Whitman’s $143 million could insure nearly 12 million families for a year. Or it could give more than 12 million families $200 a week for a year to buy groceries.

And after the election has been bought, what will we citizens get in return? If the past few years are any guide, not much.

Contrast the value placed on elective office to the value placed on editing. I’m not sure we are even talking same dimension, let alone same planet. Isn’t it interesting that corporate America keeps pressuring editors to lower their fees yet corporate America keeps raising the expense of obtaining elected office. One would think if it were good enough for editors, it would be good enough for politicians, too. (I wonder when the day will arrive when we outsource/offshore our political offices because the candidates cost less?)

Okay, I’ll concede that any politician has a greater influence on most people’s daily lives than does any editor, but that may well be because we value editorial skills so lowly. Grammar skills don’t seem to matter; spelling skills don’t seem to matter; only cost seems to matter. Yet the future of corporations lies in the communication skills of the generations of leaders yet to come, which would make, to my way of thinking, editorial skills more important than they currently are viewed. Imagine the chaos that will ensue when the corporate CEO gives instruction (or the politician drafts a bill) and those whose job it is to follow those instructions do it incorrectly for the lack of clarity. (Think of simple things like: “Johnny Depp’s wife, Brad Pitt and Matt Damon.”)

Of course, the other sad thing about the cost of buying political office is that voters’ choice is generally among those who were failures but pocketed a large fortune while failing. Carly Fiorina wants to bring jobs back to America yet fired a third of her American workforce in order to make her company more profitable and thus pocket more in bonuses. Is there a disconnect? Yet she can afford to dig into her own money to run a political campaign, whereas the successful small business owner who has created American jobs in each of the last 10 years cannot afford to run for political office against a Fiorina or Whitman.

This is much like the argument against health insurance mandates. I admit that I do not like being told what I have to spend my hard-earned money on, but I also realize that sometimes you need to spend some to make some, and these mandates are like that. Consider the person who has no health insurance and becomes ill. Where do they go for treatment? To the hospital. If they cannot afford to pay the hospital bill, what happens? The cost gets spread to those of us who either have insurance or are able to pay the bill, as well as to the government (or the taxpayer). Strikes me that opposing a mandate to carry insurance is like insisting that the government raise my taxes or that my insurance carrier raise my premium rates. Someone has to pay, and it generally falls on the taxpayer to do so, which is what gets lost in the argument.

All of which brings me full circle to the original matter: Is spending $143 million to become governor of California what we citizens want to see? Wouldn’t it be better to take that same sum of money and provide health insurance or food to 12 million American families? How did we, as a society, come to be so disconnected from what is right and good? I don’t know, but I sure don’t think spending billions of dollars on politicians is such a great idea.


  1. Spending the money is one thing, where it came from is another. Other than those that inherited it, let’s look at CEO compensation and athlete’s salaries and what does that tell us?

    It tells us that things are out of whack. Why should a CEO’s salary be 600 or 800 timmes the average employees’ salaries in that business when, without these employees doing what they do, there is no business.

    For athletes, why is any one worth over $1 or $2 million/year? Oh, the justification was that their playing lives were so short. Hmmmmmm, check how many players in all the major sports have spent well over the 5 years it was said the average playing years were supposed to be?

    In both cases, where does the mone come from that can generate the $ that pay such salaries? It comes from those who buy products/services or those that buy their products/services….or tickets to see a game, advertisers who get their money from people who buy their products.

    Under what justification in an economy such as we are now facing, that Congress voted themeselves a raise but no COL raises for Social Security were given. It seems to me that they have forgotten where the mone for their salaries comes from.

    Saying this does not mean I’m a socialist or against making a profit or nice/good income from one’s efforts. But, it has gotten out of hand because an extra penny here and here and here adds up to a lot of extra pennies that the “average Joe” has to pay so that the CEOs, athletes, etc. can get these excessive salaries.

    So, when people running for office spend their personal money and money from others who have the funds to add to it, one has to remember where all that money came from.

    Certainly, if one has the money, they are entitled to spend it as they wish to gain a political office. However, when they get there, they had better remember is was not their money that got them there . . . it was from all the people who paid more than they should have for products/services.

    When it come to how much an editor should charge for their work, certainly, they are a business, whether they are working for a publisher or as an independant business and have expenses that have to be covered. There are ratios based on time that would give them, IF they have enough work, to make a nice salary . . . but not enough salary to buy their way into political offices.

    Alan J. Zell, Ambassador of Selling at Attitudes for Sellig


    Comment by Alan J. Zell — November 1, 2010 @ 10:57 am | Reply

  2. It is rare, very rare, that anyone who desires power enough to spend millions of dollars to attain it gives a rat’s ass about the working person who doesn’t have enough to eat.


    Comment by Carolyn — November 1, 2010 @ 4:27 pm | Reply

  3. We’ve already begun the process of outsourcing politicians with the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s collection of cash from foreign sources and international corporations to spend on 2010 U.S. political campaigns.

    I’ve had nightmares that the Supreme Court decided that corporations, in that they’re “persons,” are entitled to vote. Therefore, a hundred million new corporations spring up overnight, and we human beings are hugely outvoted.


    Comment by JoyfulA — November 6, 2010 @ 9:38 am | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Create a free website or blog at

%d bloggers like this: