An American Editor

August 8, 2012

The Shirking of Responsibility

Filed under: Miscellaneous Opinion — Rich Adin @ 4:00 am
Tags: , , ,

Making the blog rounds in the not-too-distant past was commentary about how the new Nook with GlowLight has an easily damaged screen. The posts and comments came about as a result of an article that appeared at Gizmodo, “You Really Don’t Want to Drop the New Nook Simple Touch.” The article author relates what happened when he accidentally dropped his remote control onto the unprotected screen of the Nook.

A lot of bloggers immediately jumped all over the Nook. I understand that screen fragility can be a problem. Most of us know that we cannot drop our ereaders into a bathtub filled with water and expect the device to continue working; the devices aren’t waterproof. Similarly, most of us know that we cannot give our ereaders to a 6-month-old baby to play with; the devices aren’t childproof.

Yet many of these same people think the Nook should have been made car-key and remote-control proof. Why? We all know that the chance of being shot in America is high. Should the devices therefore be made bulletproof? The likelihood of carrying the device outside during a rainstorm is probably higher than the likelihood of dropping a remote control on the device, so shouldn’t the device be made waterproof?

It seems to me that we know that these devices are delicate before we buy them. Consequently, many of us buy protective covers and make an effort to keep the screen protected. It is also one of the sale pitches made when the sellers try to get you to buy extended warranty protection that protects against even dropping car keys on an unprotected screen.

But all of this is really beside the point, which is self-responsibility. In recent years, I’ve noted an increase in finger-pointing: whatever is wrong is wrong because it is someone else’s fault. The finger-pointer rarely points to him- or herself while claiming to be part of the problem. Need we look any further than the American Congress? Everything is President Obama’s fault, nothing is the fault of congressional partisanship.

Even in the world of ebooks the lack of personal responsibility is evident. Consider how many ebookers think there is nothing wrong with pirating an ebook simply because it can be done or because the price is too high or because the edition the ebooker wants isn’t yet available. The justifications are myriad but what is really important is that the moral code of responsibility for one’s actions has deteriorated in the Internet age.

The Internet has made it easy for people to find like-minded netizens who encourage antisocial behavior and the finger-pointing that occurs. Even if a person takes steps to assuage some critics, there are always new critics who are not satisfied. Because the Internet has made it easy to shout one’s complaints to a worldwide audience, we have become a society of complainers rather than of solvers.

I’ve noted an additional phenomenon of the Internet age that acts as support for the lack of self-responsibility; that is, the Internet supports and encourages anonymity, which tends to drown out solutions and trumpet problems or claimed problems. In my youth, which I admit was a very long time ago, if I had a complaint, I had to make it in person or in writing with my identity clearly revealed. Everyone ignored anonymous letters and telephone calls. Contrast that with today. Anonymous is found everywhere.

Reputations are readily sullied today by anonymous rantings. As I noted in The Uneducated Reader, people give credence to anonymous book reviews, even to ones where the reviewer clearly has not read the book. As a result of the anonymous phenomenon that the Internet encourages, people believe they can say and do anything without the need to take responsibility for what they say and do.

Consequently, products that work well are subject to atypical tests and downgraded because they fail the atypical test. How many Kindles, I wonder, could withstand concrete blocks being dropped on them from a height of 5 feet or could survive being washed by itself in a washing machine (normal cycle) and then run through the dryer for an hour at high heat? Isn’t that how you would clean a dirty ereader?

Look at what people display on social media like Facebook about themselves. Do I really care that Jane Doe got rip-roaring drunk last night? In olden days, the world didn’t know about it; today, there is not a place in the world that doesn’t.

This is not only a problem of a lack of self-responsibility, it is also a problem of lack of self-esteem. The two seem to go hand-in-hand — the more a person lacks self-esteem, the more irresponsible they seem to be and the more they are inclined to finger point. The more they finger point, the more they are willing to see themselves as outside the problem and not part of the problem.

Am I the only one who has noticed this?



  1. No, you are not the only one who has noticed this!


    Comment by Carolyn — August 8, 2012 @ 5:46 am | Reply

  2. Another aspect of this is that once a criticism is lodged it apparently gives everyone a right to jump on the bandwagon. I’m sure as writers we’re all aware of this behaviour: sometimes you give your work to the reading group and it just provokes a feeding frenzy of ‘and another thing I noticed’, ‘and another thing I didn’t like’, ‘why didn’t you …’ ad infinitum from one and all. A good example of it sometimes happens on the Review section of Newsnight over here. The panel sometimes absolutely shreds work. The panellists seem to be so keen on appearing witty and modern that the work being discussed becomes just a jumping off point for a good rubbishing. Even if those critiquing remember the golden rule to first find something you like about the thing you’re criticising, a hatchet job often still follows. The creator of the work is supposed to take it on the chin. Creative egos are notoriously fragile: why should one take what amounts to abuse of this kind? So also with the Nook: why should the designers and manufacturers be bombarded like this? But is it irresponsibility or some other trait in the human psyche at work here?


    Comment by judimoore — August 8, 2012 @ 8:25 am | Reply

  3. Ridiculous expectations, decline in common sense and ignorant bandwagon-jumping are rampant these days, and have been for awhile. I’m not sure if insanely litigious behavior came before or from those tendencies, but, either way: Sigh.


    Comment by Ruth E. Thaler-Carter — August 8, 2012 @ 9:34 am | Reply

  4. […] Link to his Blog: http://americaneditor […]


    Pingback by Look After Our Ereaders, Being Responsible For Our Actions | — August 8, 2012 @ 6:25 pm | Reply

  5. You are not the only one who noticed! It seems there has been a steady decline for decades. Many of my sons’ friends were bailed out of situations they created and never had to take responsibility for their actions. And how many public figures ‘caught in the act’, whatever it was, have blamed someone else for their actions? I hope my sons are raising their children the way they were raised; to take responsibility for everything they did. Self-esteem and self-responsibility begin at home.


    Comment by Ruth Rainwater — August 8, 2012 @ 8:47 pm | Reply

  6. I have been complaining (ha) about this for a while now. I occasionally TA for an online composition class and I have been blamed for many a failed paper. I have nothing to do with the one paragraph long, completely spoon-fed style assignment descriptions or the (constantly available to the students) rubrics used to grade the papers, and yet the failure is mine somehow. Not taking personal responsibility is pretty rampant in the non-collegiate education system as well, of course, but since I am about to start grading again soon, I’m feeling just – ugh – about this issue. I’m pretty sure my linguistic skills are dwindling with each paper and whiny email I read. And every time I have to explain that you don’t need extra credit if you complete the assignments and none is available anyway a piece of me dies.


    Comment by misssmithofthedead — August 8, 2012 @ 9:20 pm | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: