An American Editor

August 1, 2016

On Politics: Freelancing in a Trumpian World

I’m worried. Neither U.S. presidential hopeful is my ideal choice, and no, I was not a Cruzian; nor did I feel the Bern — in my 50-plus years of voting and following politics, I can’t remember a worse lot of primary candidates to choose from. But if I set aside general policy disagreements with the nominees and instead focus on my future as a freelancer, I can’t get past the Trumpian worldview.

Freelance editing has been globalized for decades. The globalization began in the 1980s with the consolidation of publishing companies into a few international conglomerates, the laying off of in-house staff, and the increased use of freelancers to fulfill previously in-house functions. I worked with several publishers over the years who had no in-house editing staff, just production staff, and even the number of production staff was limited because much of the production work was outsourced.

Globalization, of course, rapidly grew with the rise of the Internet and ever-faster computers with more capable software. When I began my career, the dominant software program for copyediting was XyWrite. Lippincott, which was at the time an independent, major book publisher, required freelancers to travel to its New York City office to be tested on their XyWrite skills and to be “taught” how to use the Lippincott version of the program. XyWrite’s primary competitor was WordPerfect. When Windows began to take over the desktop, XyWrite struggled to create a Windows version; the ultimate product was poor. WordPerfect did much better and became the leading word processing program until it was sold to Novell, a company that had no clue about consumer-focused software. Ultimately, Microsoft Word was crowned king.

Once Word took the throne, once Windows came to dominate the desktop computer, and once the Internet became truly usable from anywhere on Earth, the freelance editing industry became a global industry. Freelancers now obtained work from all over the planet, and the packaging industry began taking over the production of books. Today, American freelance editors may receive work from India, England, Australia — any place you can name. Similarly, freelance editors in those countries can and do receive work originating in the United States.

So, what happens when globalization becomes threatened? Donald Trump speaks of retreating from globalization, making the retreat a goal of his presidency. He talks of canceling trade treaties, of demanding that foreign-sourced work now be brought back to the United States. We know he is focused on manufacturing, but to think that there will be no ripple effect is to be naïve.

According to some pundits in publishing, the book industry is in trouble. We all know reading is in decline (see, e.g., “Sharp Decline in Children Reading for Pleasure, Survey Finds” by Alison Flood [The Guardian (US Edition), January 9, 2015], “Reading Study Shows Remarkable Decline in U.S.” by Lynn Neary [All Things Considered, NPR, WNYC Radio, November 19, 2007 (Transcript of program)], “The Decline of the American Book Lover” by Jordan Weissman [The Atlantic, January 21, 2014], and “Decline in Reading in the U.S.” [EBSCO Host Connection]), and it appears that overall book sales are either stagnant or declining. To make more money, publishers are cutting costs. One way is by increasing the tasks that are outsourced and paying less to the freelancers to whom the work is outsourced. (I find it interesting that executive pay in publishing has increased since 1995 but that most publishers and packagers are offering freelance editors the same pay as was handed out in 1995. No adjustment for inflation.) Bringing those tasks back to the United States will not result in higher-paying in-house jobs for editors.

In fact, it is unlikely that the jobs will be brought back at all. More likely, books will be edited by non-American editors. I have seen the start of this trend; in recent years, I have watched projects that I wouldn’t do for the offered fee be assigned to foreign editors.

Not long ago, I was contacted by a packager from Ireland. We had no problem coming to agreement, except when it came to price. With the maximum they were willing to pay, I would have received 96 cents per page for editing technical material on a short deadline. The packager is clearly able to find editors willing to work for that price, but how many American editors can accept so little money to edit technical material?

I see a practical problem for freelance editors in the event of a Trump presidency: if the United States becomes protectionist in trade policy, should we not expect retaliation and/or reciprocation? With much of the publishing industry consolidated into non-American firms, how effective can a retreat from globalization be for us? Economists are already saying that if we want to see how well the Trump program will work, we only need to look at Walmart’s re-Americanization efforts (see “If Wal-Mart Can’t Bring Manufacturing Back to America, How Can Trump?” by Shannon Pettypiece, Bloomberg Businessweek, July 14, 2016).

So, because I’m a freelance editor who relies on business from around the world, the prospect of having Donald Trump as president alarms me. Some Trump supporters say that this is just bluster on Trump’s part, that he will not really upset the American economy, and that he will modify his stance once elected. That is a gamble I am unwilling to take.

Trump reminds me of Berzelius “Buzz” Windrip, the populist U.S. senator who is elected president after promising America First economic policies in Sinclair Lewis’s novel It Can’t Happen Here. If you haven’t read the novel, you should. Although written in 1935, it could be about the 2016 election. Also worth reading is “Trump’s Bigotry Revives Fears of ‘It Can’t Happen Here’” by Michael Winship (Moyers & Company, December 8, 2015).

There are, in my view, many economic reasons not to vote for Trump for president (e.g., “After 9/11, Trump Took Money Marked for Small Businesses” by Michael Warren [The Weekly Standard, February 15, 2016], “Donald Trump Sued Everyone but His Hairdresser” by Olivia Nuzzi [The Daily Beast, July 6, 2015], “How Donald Trump Bankrupted His Atlantic City Casinos, but Still Earned Millions” by Russ Buettner and Charles V. Bagli [The New York Times, June 11, 2016], and “Donald Trump’s Deals Rely on Being Creative With the Truth” by David Barstow [The New York Times, July 16, 2016]) as well as the social and cultural downsides to him as a candidate (e.g., his view of women [see, e.g., “Crossing the Line: How Donald Trump Behaved With Women in Private” by Michael Barbaro and Megan Twoheymay (The New York Times, May 14, 2016), “Donald Trump Hates Women: It’s the One Position He’s Never Changed” by Franklin Foer (Slate, March 24, 2016), and “Sorry, Ivanka. I’m Not Buying that Donald Trump Will Be a Champion for Women” by Vivien Labaton (CNBC, July 22, 2016)]); his denial of human involvement in climate change [see, e.g., “Trump and Pence Are a Match Made in Climate Change Denial Heaven” by Natalie Schreyer (Newsweek, July 15, 2016) and “Water World: Rising Tides Close in on Trump, the Climate Change Denier” by Suzanne Goldenberg (The Guardian [US Edition], July 6, 2016)]; his clear dislike of non–Northern European immigrants; his willingness to tear apart families; his lack of trustworthiness; his short temper; and his threat to America’s existence even four years from now. But the danger he poses to the way the freelance editing business works in the real world is sufficient reason for me to vote for Hillary Clinton. That is what I encourage all freelancers to do — vote for Hillary Clinton because Donald Trump’s world economic view is a danger to our livelihood.

(Addendum: Recently, Donald Trump asked a foreign government to intervene in the upcoming election. A petition to the White House asking for an investigation of Trump’s actions has been created at We the People, which is the government’s website for petitioning the White House. If you would like to review the petition and perhaps sign it, go to the petition at We the People. Sadly, as each day passes there are additional revelations, such as this one in The Guardian: “Donald Trump and Russia: A Web That Grows More Tangled All the Time.”)

Richard Adin, An American Editor

9 Comments »

  1. She’s got my vote for economic and many reasons. The fact is that our trade agreements have net benefited this country, and doing away with them would disadvantage our country in international trade. While I still get a lot of my work from U.S. orgs (more nonprofits than publishers nowadays), a substantial piece of my income comes from a British press that has offices in NYC and farms out production to India, which is the office I now interact with. It would hurt my business if I could not work with this company in the future.

    Like

    Comment by Teresa Barensfeld — August 1, 2016 @ 10:12 am | Reply

  2. I find Trump terrifying on many levels, most of which you’ve summarized or “resource-ized” so effectively.

    Like

    Comment by Ruth E. Thaler-Carter — August 1, 2016 @ 11:06 am | Reply

  3. I’m with you and with Hillary, for the many, many economic and other reasons you’ve cited, Rich. Thanks for the links, especially to We the People.

    Like

    Comment by Marian Rogers, Ithaca, NY — August 1, 2016 @ 11:13 am | Reply

  4. The thing I find most frightening is that so many Americans are already supporting that lying, egotistical, hypocritical, racist, misogynist, ignorant, creepy gasbag (sorry, I couldn’t help myself there). So it’s not just him we should be worried about, it’s our fellow citizens.

    Like

    Comment by Valerie Spanswick — August 2, 2016 @ 3:52 am | Reply

    • Many of those “supporting” Trump are not really supporting him. They see a vote for him as a way to register a protest against Congress and Hillary Clinton. Let’s face it — Hillary has a lot of flaws and they all relate to how she relates to people. Consider, for example, the email debacle. When it first occurred, she should have said “I was wrong and I will let the FBI try to recover the deleted emails if Congressional Republicans will agree to this one condition: No text of any recovered email will be disclosed to anyone unless the FBI determines that the email is something other than private, personal email. Congress must agree that the emails will not be subpoenable.” (Of course, it could be more artfully said than I have just said.) This would have changed the whole dynamic and people would be more inclined to find her trustworthy on this issue. Unfortunately, it is not just the email issue. Hillary has and exudes a certain arrogance that does not go over well with people who are struggling. It is not that she can’t cure these problems, it is that she is not getting advice from the right people on how to do it — all her advisers are of the same cloth as her; she needs advisers from my kind of cloth too, but has always found it difficult to relate to people of my (low) social class. She was an excellent senator and secretary of state, but that is not enough.

      Like

      Comment by americaneditor — August 2, 2016 @ 9:48 am | Reply

  5. We are in truly serious trouble now: According to the Borowitz Report,

    “’When that 3 A.M. call comes in, and Mr. Trump is busy on Twitter, Dr. Carson and Governor Palin will be there to take the call,’ Trump’s spokesperson said.”

    See “Trump Bolsters Foreign-Policy Team by Adding Carson and Palin” (http://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/trump-bolsters-foreign-policy-team-by-adding-carson-and-palin?mbid=nl_080216%20Borowitz%20Newsletter%20(1)&CNDID=25054223&spMailingID=9291284&spUserID=MTA5MjQwMzU2OTEzS0&spJobID=980138584&spReportId=OTgwMTM4NTg0S0)

    Like

    Comment by americaneditor — August 2, 2016 @ 10:14 am | Reply

  6. Rich, not surprisingly, I disagree strongly with your criticisms of HRC in that comment. However, rather than prolonging that aspect of the discussion, it makes more sense to stay within the economic argument you made in your original post regarding the impact of the choice of president on editorial freelancers. This is an angle we don’t see too often in other discussions, and it’s something we as freelancers need to be aware of.

    I can remember when offshoring of freelance editing work started to take hold. Sure, it had been going on to some extent probably for years, but it at a certain point it reached the level where many if not most North American freelancers became directly affected by it. I remember some would take the stance that we needed to somehow convince U.S. publishers (as if there is any such thing anymore, given the international nature of most publishing corporations now) that we were the best and they shouldn’t give our work to people overseas who would work cheaper. Some dug in their heals and complained mightily on editing discussion lists about how their workload and hence their income had decreased, but took no action to stem those losses. Others saw the writing on the wall and marketed to clients other than those megapublishers who had diverted the work they used to send them to workers overseas. Some found ways to work more efficiently and compete in a now international marketplace. In time, we see that the market for freelancers really is international, and we are able to compete, for many reasons. So a president that promises protectionism is not in our best interests — nor in the best interests of the country. Solving the challenges of international trade by closing ranks is a backward and dangerous policy. That’s the point I find quite salient for us as freelancers (and as Americans).

    Like

    Comment by Teresa Barensfeld — August 2, 2016 @ 10:19 am | Reply

    • So, Teresa, you do not think HRC has any problem with voters as a result of how she has handled things? I am not suggesting she did anything wrong but that from a PR view, she handled herself badly, which is why her distrust numbers are barely indistinguishable from Trump’s numbers. HRC is one of the most disliked and mistrusted politicians probably ever — significantly more so than Bill, even among Republicans. Granted the Republicans helped boost those feelings with all their wasteful inquiries, but realistically she let herself come across to voters as above everyone else. That is of her own doing. The Republicans didn’t make the decision to use a private server, which is against the law, and as you know, that Colin Powell did the same is not an excuse. She knew she wanted to be president and knew the Republicans would be gunning for her and yet did it anyway. And she mishandled herself when she was caught. You cannot attribute all of Trump’s support to voter stupidity, no matter how much you may wish. The dislike of HRC among voters is not without foundation. Even Bernie’s supporters are hesitant to support her, even when the alternative is Trump. I may support HRC, but I do not do so with blinders on about her faults.

      Like

      Comment by americaneditor — August 2, 2016 @ 11:48 am | Reply

      • As I said, I’d not interested in discussing general criticism of HRC or DT here, but focus on the economic impact to freelancers. There are plenty of other places to have the general political discussion. You know my email address!

        FYI, the current polling suggests that the race is no longer close, if it ever was. Polling also shows that about 85-90% of Bernie supporters now support HRC.

        Like

        Comment by Teresa Barensfeld — August 2, 2016 @ 12:05 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: