An American Editor

November 30, 2016

On Politics: The Future of American Education

Most editors recognize that the foundation of our business lies in the education we received. It is hard to tackle grammar issues in a manuscript without having been taught grammar. And deciding whether the correct word is there or their requires having been taught the difference.

Of course, there is the issue of subject matter knowledge as well. Granted that editors are rarely expected to be subject-matter experts — especially not at the common rates paid to editors — but editors are expected to have some familiarity with the subject matter and to be able to understand what they are editing.

I have lamented in past essays about the decline of editing and of education. Now I worry even more with the nomination of Elizabeth “Betsy” DeVos to be Secretary of Education in the forthcoming Trump presidency. Her selection is tantamount to declaring war on public education and on education standards — public and private. If her views on education permeate the educational system, what I see as a decline in quality of editors may well become a tsunami.

The foundation of America’s education system is that it is a public education system, meaning that every child has access to a “free” public education (and, yes, there is really no such thing as “free” in this context; public education is an expensive taxpayer burden, but a burden that since the early days of the republic taxpayers have been willing to bear in hopes that their children will do better economically and socially than they did). In DeVos’ world there would be no “public” education — all education would be by private schools, largely charter schools.

I admit that there was a time when I thought charter schools would be a panacea to our declining school systems, but that fantasy didn’t last long. The truth is that to fix our schools, we need to fix the way our teachers are taught and compensated. Rather than mid-level students choosing teaching as a career path, we need to find a way to make the highest-level students seek that career. And we need to require teachers to be subject-matter experts not generalists whose expertise is in classroom administration with a minor in subject matter.

Whereas I have progressed from thinking charter schools are the panacea to education’s ills, DeVos has not. In fact, DeVos not only abhors public schools, but she opposes setting standards for charter and private schools to meet. DeVos has been supporting proponents of her education views for years in Michigan. The result is that Michigan not only has more charter and private schools than any other state, but its educational ranking (in comparison to other states) has been steadily slipping, with no end in sight. (For an excellent review of DeVos’ history, see “Betsy DeVos, Trump’s Education Pick, Has Steered Money From Public Schools” by Kate Zernike [news item], The New York Times, November 23, 2016, and for why she would be a disaster for American education, see “Betsy DeVos and the Wrong Way to Fix Schools” by Douglas N. Harris [opinion piece], The New York Times, November 25, 2016.)

What does this mean for the future of editing? Even though education has been on the decline for years and this decline has been evident in the quality of new-generation editors and editing — as witnessed by the number of people hanging out shingles, proclaiming themselves editors, and then failing to do a quality job — there were rays of hope as colleges began to realize that they are a major part of the problem of education failure and steps have slowly been taken to revamp education curriculum and requirements for a teaching degree and license.

But what little progress has been made is now jeopardized because all of the controls that are exercised over education in public schools are nonexistent in the DeVos education world. DeVos believes that the free market, unfettered by chains of requirements to obtain a teaching license and unfettered by educational goals that part of standards such as the Common Core or national tests, will supply the needed fixes — even though this has been untrue in the 30 years she has pushed such an agenda.

If education further, significantly declines, then editing may be a doomed profession. After all, why would an author want a manuscript edited by someone without the skills necessary to edit her manuscript better than she can edit it herself? Why would publishers pay someone to simply run spellcheck?

This is not to say that our current system is the answer; it definitely has proven itself to not being able to solve the education crisis. The problem is that with DeVos we will swing from one extreme to another extreme, which is problematic when both extremes have conclusively shown that they are part of the problem, not part of the solution.

Do I have a solution? No, I don’t. I do know that for years I have complained about the low standards that have to be met to graduate from a college education program with a teaching degree (I attended such a college in my college days). I know that I have clashed with teachers who should never have been given a teaching license but who were teaching my children in public schools. And I know that the way to fix the problem is not to replace it with another “solution” that is just an exacerbation of the existing problem.

Betsy DeVos should not be confirmed as Secretary of Education because her “solutions” have proven, in Michigan, to be worse than the existing problem. To institute those policies nationally would be to jeopardize America’s future. I encourage you to petition your U.S. Senator to not confirm Elizabeth “Betsy” DeVos as Secretary of Education. Her confirmation would be disastrous for America and for the future of editing.

Richard Adin, An American Editor

5 Comments »

  1. Back in 1968 when I completed my college courses necessary for teacher certification, I stated that subject-matter expertise was the basis of good teaching (not a popular belief at a time when everything was gearing up for methods, variety, entertaining the class, and maintaining discipline in the classroom.) “And we need to require teachers to be subject-matter experts not generalists whose expertise is in classroom administration with a minor in subject matter.” I agree completely with your statement. Throwing money at physical plant, computers, fancy chalk boards, buildings, and sports programs since 1970 have not made for better education. Haven’t the SAT scores declined since then?

    Like

    Comment by oliviadiamond — November 30, 2016 @ 8:12 am | Reply

  2. Every system in this country is broken and the education system is one of the worst. This broken system is part of why I left medical school; I never felt I was actually learning anything because I was too busy trying to pass a test that wouldn’t matter in twenty years. I’d suggest everyone homeschool, but not everyone has time for that and, the way things are now, probably not the best idea at the moment.

    Like

    Comment by atypicalfemme — November 30, 2016 @ 10:39 am | Reply

  3. Trillions of dollars have been spent on public schools, and they get worse and worse and worse. Homeschool or send children to charter or private schools.

    Like

    Comment by Cecilia E. (Davitt) Thurlow — November 30, 2016 @ 11:30 am | Reply

  4. The dumbing down of America, unfortunately, is alive and growing. I went to public school and graduated in 1965, when you actually were taught all the basics and more to be able to find a job. Nowadays, colleges and universities have had to add basic English/grammar classes because students are not taught the basics in K-12. Education will continue to decline with Betsy DeVos as Secretary of Education. We need someone who really cares about our children and what is needed for them to be educated to survive in the world today.

    Like

    Comment by Jacqueline (Jacqui) Brownstein — November 30, 2016 @ 1:08 pm | Reply

  5. I remember when I worked as a proofreader in-house and we had copyholders we would train. They, if competent, would advance to revisers, make-up persons, and eventually after five to ten years to proofreaders. We proofreaders always wanted the trainees who had received at least eight years or more of parochial school education. They were the only people who could read without stumbling all over the place.

    Like

    Comment by Cecilia E. (Davitt) Thurlow — December 1, 2016 @ 11:18 am | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: