An American Editor

May 11, 2020

On the Basics: Scams are always with us

Filed under: Editorial Matters — An American Editor @ 10:15 am

By Ruth E. Thaler-Carter, Owner

An American Editor

I’ve been warning colleagues about over-payment scams for years — and I recently received one for the first time! I wouldn’t usually take up AAE space with a scam warning, but I’ve been seeing inquiries about this particular one ever since it reached me, in e-mail discussion lists and several Facebook groups. A lot of people apparently either have never heard of this type of scam or just aren’t following discussions that warn about the current version. It seems to be prevalent and convincing enough to warn our subscribers about it.

In the first message I received, someone using claimed to have a medical condition and to need a 2,550-word article written about general health topics for a presentation at a conference, quoting a rate that fit my usual fee structure — and was a lot more than most writing assignments usually offer these days. It included a list of topics to be included and looked like an easy project to do.

I responded by e-mail to say that I was interested and require a 50% deposit from new clients. There was no argument, although my radar started pinging when the “client” asked, “What would be your preferred mode of payment? Though I’m proposing a certified bank draft, a cashier’s check or bank certified check.” The pings started going bonkers when FedEx delivered a check the very next day — a Saturday, and at not even 9 a.m.! The supposed sender was a “Jerry Orchid” in Houston, but the check was apparently drawn on an account of a John Wieland in Atlanta, GA, and issued by Vinings Bank in Smyrna, GA. Neither name matched the sender of the e-mail, and the amount was more than twice the agreed-upon deposit.

Almost as soon as the check arrived, the sender asked me via e-mail to deposit it right way, along with something about a longer or additional assignment that I didn’t quite follow — that that seemed far less important than the excessive payment and pressure to use the check immediately. I said I couldn’t get to the bank until Monday, although I already was sure this was an attempt at an overpayment scam. On Monday, I called the bank that supposedly issued the check (it was closed over the weekend) and they confirmed that it was counterfeit; in fact, I was the fifth person to call about such a check.

I wrote back to the “client” to say I knew this was a scam and that I was going to report them to the authorities, and I haven’t heard from them since. I did not pay or lose any money — but that’s only because I didn’t deposit the phony check. If I had, they would have said they mistakenly sent too much and asked for the “difference” back. The check would have been counterfeit, so I’d have been out the amount I sent back, as well as the full amount of the check, among other headaches, possibly including charges for bank fraud.

The bottom line

Versions of this scam have been going on since before e-mail and online shopping began, in all kinds of areas, from small and large Craigslist purchases to home rentals and more. Regardless of the sender, apparent assignment, amount of offer, etc.: If you ever get a check or money order for more than an agreed-up amount, don’t take it — or at least call the bank of the supposed owner of the bank account before depositing it to your account. That’s usually faster than asking your bank or the authorities to look into it. It can take several days for a check to go through channels to be confirmed as counterfeit, and the scammer will be long gone by then. Money orders might be easier to verify, but call the supposed issuer before trying to deposit one.

Other potential concerns

Another recent scam that keeps popping back up involves being contacted because the sender supposedly found you through one of your professional memberships. They offer work in or somewhat related to your service area, for a known major company (Bayer, Random House, Penguin and other well-known businesses have been named in this one). Among the red flags is that the sender’s e-ddress is not based on the company name, although some have used names of people who do actually work for the company, and that they include a request for you to be interviewed via Google Hangout. These don’t seem to involve offers of money that turn out to be counterfeit, but might be aimed at identity theft.

There are other recurring scams aimed at our profession, but most are so badly written that they’re obviously not worth a response. On the other hand, those who work with authors whose first language is not English are likely to get clumsily worded requests for editing or proofreading assistance, so we shouldn’t automatically assume that every clunky message is from a scammer.

On a related matter, colleague Beth Lasser posted a warning that while “people mention concerns about their bank details being revealed and their resumes being in random hands. Yet, our bank details are on our checks, and we put our resumes on multiple websites. What we don’t necessarily put out there is our address, birthday, income, relatives’ names, religion, and political affiliation. However, this information is on people search sites like My Life and Spokeo.”

To remove yourself from these sites or have your profile hidden, go to:

Lee Drake of OS-Cubed, one of my tech-savvy colleagues from back home in Rochester, NY, recently warned that “We’re all aware of the more common ways hackers can infiltrate your business. But as technology advances, the bad guys are getting even more creative about stealing your data.” He’s produced a video about “3 cyber threats you probably aren’t aware of.” You can check that out at

The bottom line

This all comes down to being cautious about how we conduct our editing and other editorial businesses. Sadly, if an offer seems too good to be true, that’s probably exactly what it is. As one of my favorite “Hill Street Blues” characters used to say, “Be careful out there.” Every day and in every way.

Ruth E. Thaler-Carter ( is an award-winning provider of editorial and publishing services for publications, independent authors, publishers, associations, nonprofits and companies worldwide, and the editor-in-chief and now owner of An American Editor. She also hosts the annual Communication Central “Be a Better Freelancer”® conference for colleagues (, now co-hosted with the National Association of Independent Writers and Editors ( and sponsored by An American Editor, and (still) planned for October 2–4 in Baltimore, MD. She can be reached at or


  1. I’ve just received another attempt at the same over-payment scam, this time from someone calling themself “Carol, an academic consultant”; using the e-ddress; and saying, “I have a speech distorting condition called Apraxia (Just FYI lol). I got your contact details online and I need your service. Can you write an article on a specific topic for an upcoming workshop? The article is to be given as a handbook to the attendees of the workshop. I have a title for the article and have drafted an outline to guide you. Please get back to me for more information.” It even includes a phone number, which I was tempted to use to express my opinion of the sender. Colleagues, beware.


    Comment by An American Editor — May 25, 2020 @ 10:35 am | Reply

  2. Yet another probably wrinkle on the apraxia overpayment scam ( I got a LinkedIn inquiry from someone whose profile said they were a state representative, but whose message said they owned some kind of business. They asked about my writing a 7,125-word (oddly precise number!) article about alcohol abuse, at $1/word, for an event. It looked and smelled a little like the apraxia scam, but I wasn’t sure, so I said I’d think about it and get back to them. I checked and there is a representative by that name in the state mentioned – but when I went back to LI just now to say thanks but no thanks, the conversation had disappeared and he doesn’t seem to be on LI!
    (In talking about this with a colleague yesterday, I suddenly realized why the apraxia scam is so weird: Having a speech condition wouldn’t prevent someone from writing their own material for a handout at a workshop or conference. Presenting, sure; writing, nope.)


    Comment by An American Editor — March 11, 2022 @ 12:25 pm | Reply

  3. Hi. I just learned about your blog (including this specific post) from NAIWE email stream between members. I’ve subscribed to your blog as it looks to be very helpful. Thanks for sharing all this.
    I didn’t realize I could remove (or hide) my personal information. I’ll check out that link you provided in a day or so.
    I’ve been stalked and harassed online before (not tied to my writing or editing life). And then they ended up finding me in multiple places online and were harassing me there as well. So, getting this information unlisted or removed is great to know.
    I noticed you said the email you received was from protonmail. I realize you were not saying that it being from Proton was an issue or a red flag.
    But for anyone who isn’t familiar with Proton, it is a very valid and secure way to email. It’s been said that it is the most secure way to email in the entire world. They are fantastic company. And they offer a free version of their email account services, too (it’s still a pretty generous size amount).
    Unfortunately, for a long time (before they became more widely known), a lot of shady characters used both Proton and Discord for drug dealings and others illegal things specifically because both were so secure and it’s extremally difficult for authorities to trace back to the users.
    That is no longer the predominate crowd that uses either Proton or Discord (I’ve been on both for a long time).
    I just wanted to put this info on Proton out there in case it’s useful for anyone.
    I am surprised that scammers used proton since it seems to be much easier to set up bogus gmail accounts. But, I suspect they aren’t as much anymore because (a) Google is trying to crack down on misuse of their email services and (b) scammers know that gmail accounts don’t look official.
    Thanks again for the useful information!
    – Cindy


    Comment by Cindy Bahl — March 12, 2022 @ 9:54 pm | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Create a free website or blog at

%d bloggers like this: