An American Editor

February 24, 2010

On Words: Believe and Know

Several events in the past few weeks suddenly converged in my mind, causing me to realize that in the discourse about ebooks, especiall about what constitutes fair ebook pricing, the unbridgeable divide is between believe and know.

The first events were discussions about ebooks and what constitutes fair pricing for an ebook. Three types of people participated in those discussions: those who admittedly had no direct knowledge of the costs involved in publishing an ebook, those who did have direct knowledge, and those who believed they knew. As is typical of such discussions, those who admitted not knowing were open to learning and the other two types were trying to teach. But between the teachers there was no room to compromise; those who believed they knew — the believers — simply would not consider or accept that believe and know are not synonymous, that there is a chasm between the two words.

Then came the New York Times Magazine article, “How Christian Were the Founders?”, which discussed the efforts by pressure groups in Texas to shape the secondary school curriculum by requiring textbooks to reflect their view of history. This pressure was previously applied to the science curriculum, the Kansas school board fight having made national headlines.

The article and the ebook fair-pricing discussions brought to mind this war between two words: belief and knowledge. The core problem in the discussions about both pricing and textbook content is the chasm between believe and know.

Believe, although having some slim foundation in evidence, signifies something unprovable (or perhaps less provable), and thus less firmly based in evidence, than know, whose foundation is firmly based on the provable and demonstrable. For example, we may believe there is minimal cost to creating an ebook of a pbook, but we do not know what that cost is — we can’t prove it or demonstrate it. The same concept holds true for any belief, whether economic, cultural, religious, scientific, or something else.

Unlike know, believe covers a wide range of credulity. Know is more constrained; its verity must be demonstrable. Believe needs no more than the statement “I believe” something to be true, leaving it to the listener to supply the factual base — no matter how slim or wobbly — for where to place the belief on the continuum that ranges from pure speculation to pure fact.

Believe denotes the acceptance of the truth or actuality of something, that it is real, even if it may not be real. For example, the belief that because an ebook is a digital file of the pbook, there is no cost to creating the ebook. Know, on the other hand, has its basis in experience rather than acceptance, such as the experience of smelling a rose. Having never smelled a rose, I could say that I believe the rose’s fragrance is similar to that of a skunk; but having smelled both a rose and a skunk, I could say I know that the rose’s fragrance is dissimilar to that of the skunk.

A belief statement might ultimately prove correct, but then believe would transform itself to know. The know statement, however, cannot be transformed from know to believe. Once I have smelled both the rose and the skunk, that I know doesn’t change. What I know might change, but not that I know.

Believe embraces the possibility of doubt: No matter how firmly one believes something, by describing that conviction as a belief, one ascribes some doubt, albeit infinitesimally small, as to the verity of that belief. In contrast, know doesn’t permit that possibility of doubt; it doesn’t permit any doubt: I believe the rose smells like a skunk, but I know it doesn’t.

It is the improper use of these two words that leads to the ongoing cultural wars that are reflected in the battles over what should and should not be taught in school and what is or is not a fair price for an ebook. Too many people equate believe with know. They are neither the same nor does each include the other. It is when believe transforms to know that fact is possible, but until that transformation occurs there is always some doubt.

Interestingly, know not only cannot transform to believe, but it cannot embrace believe as a component of itself. To do so would be to weaken know and impose that element of doubt that distinguishes it from believe. In this instance, know must stand aloof and by itself.

Would proper use and understanding of these words deflect any of the passionate discourse that surrounds “I believe” statements in the cultural and ebook pricing wars? I doubt it would matter. There are some things that we grasp and cannot let go, that are beyond believe and know in the sense of a willingness to transform from the former to the latter; after all, we invented these words as a method of describing those immutable beliefs and distinguishing between possibility and fact. But proper use and understanding might shine a different light on the divide and permit a coming closer together. Unlike conflicting knowledge, it is impossible to reconcile conflicting belief, which is why we can expect the question of what is fair ebook pricing to remain unresolvable.



  1. […] and production services to publishers and authors. This is reprinted, with permission, from his An American Editor blog. PB Digg us. Slashdot us. Facebook us. Twitter us. Share the […]


    Pingback by On Words: Believe and Know | TeleRead: Bring the E-Books Home — February 24, 2010 @ 2:49 pm | Reply

  2. What it truly means to know something is an old and oft-argued question. Argued often enough, in fact, that it is given its own little corner of philosophy: epistemology.

    You have stated in another way a problem I have with so many arguments from so many people: Too few people are willing to admit the slightest possibility that they are wrong. (I also believe that those who object the loudest are least likely to admit error, but I have no data to back that up.)

    Perhaps people have been so steeped in absolute faith that it spills out into every aspect of their beliefs, so that to question the veracity of one’s beliefs, no matter how trite, is to question that person’s very faith. I don’t know, but it can get damn annoying.

    I have to disagree with your statement that know “cannot embrace believe as a component of itself,” though. It’s a difficult argument to say that one can know something without believing it. I would argue that knowledge does replace belief — in the way that “on sale” is replaced with “sold” — but that knowledge is an enhancement of belief — in the way that a fighter jet is an enhancement of that fighter jet’s blueprints. It’s simply illogical that one could know something that one does not believe — at least without lying to oneself.

    If you really want to get into it, look into Gettier’s problems with the common epistemological definition of knowledge as “a true, justified belief.”


    Comment by 4ndyman — February 24, 2010 @ 9:40 pm | Reply

    • 4ndyman doesn’t really disagree, he just believes he does. Common definitions are often based on epidemiological error and philosophical misapprehension.
      There is no need to argue that the faith/belief combine isn’t actually the situation dealt with here. The etymology of the word “Believe”, from the Sanskrit is clear enough, the tension between “bel” (war) and “eve” (nurture), should be enough of a clue to those who still maintain the false belief that to ‘know’ and to ‘believe’ are the same thing.

      Liked by 1 person

      Comment by hybridrogue1 — October 9, 2014 @ 10:58 am | Reply

  3. Love browsing your page, always learn something interesting facts.
    Emily R. from Husky Tips


    Comment by huskylover — March 12, 2010 @ 1:31 am | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Create a free website or blog at

%d bloggers like this: